The Leader Label: Using Social
Constructionism and Metaphor to Influence the Leadership Perceptions of
Graduate Business and Public Adminstration Students
by Jeffrey Zacko-Smith
Seattle University
2007
This research examined the use of metaphor as a tool of discourse,
applying it specifically to the field of leadership. Utilizing a
post-modern social constructionist framework under which the construct
“leader” was highly pliable, and was created, enhanced, mitigated or
destroyed via language and interaction, this study investigated whether
and in what ways the intentional use of metaphor altered the individual
leadership perceptions of graduate business and public administration
students. Leadership understandings classified as “flexible” and
“inflexible” were the primary focus of this inquiry given the
hypothesized need for increasingly flexible understandings in
globalized contexts. Conventional perceptions of leaders are themselves
metaphorical: the leader is actually in the lead, the first to move
forward. This is an image appropriate for certain circumstances, but is
one seen as less relevant today because it implies an often complex
hierarchy, connotes exclusivity, and ignores context.
A two-part research question guided this study: (1) to what extent and
(2) in what way(s) were individual graduate business and public
administration students’ perceptions of leaders and leadership altered
(along a “flexible/inflexible” continuum) by the intentional use of the
metaphor “leader as social construction” in focused group discussions?
Investigative methodologies were primarily qualitative and based upon
the interaction between Q-Methodology and focus groups; since meaning
is generated socially and subjectivity is valued, the aim was to
explain individual perception change using interactional techniques.
Written interviews added depth to the findings.
The results of the study show that although perceptions were mixed
(i.e., they were flexible and inflexible both before and after the
focus group intervention), exposure to the “leader as social
construction” metaphor increased flexible leadership understandings
among a majority of the participants. These findings serve as a
catalyst for future research.
Click Here for PDF